Comments on: The Dangers Of The Great Fluoride Experiment http://naturaldentistry.us/245/the-dangers-of-the-great-fluoride-experiment/ Natural and holistic dentist serving Encinitas, San Diego, and all of North America Mon, 21 May 2012 17:25:54 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: Dr. Marvinhttp://naturaldentistry.us/245/the-dangers-of-the-great-fluoride-experiment/comment-page-1/#comment-6268 Dr. Marvin Fri, 26 Aug 2011 18:54:39 +0000 http://naturaldentistry.us/?p=245#comment-6268 Google!Actually, ozone and dentistry is not a popular combination amongst mainstream dentists.That's too bad because the benefits are amazing. Google!

Actually, ozone and dentistry is not a popular combination amongst mainstream dentists.

That’s too bad because the benefits are amazing.

]]> By: ozone therapyhttp://naturaldentistry.us/245/the-dangers-of-the-great-fluoride-experiment/comment-page-1/#comment-6252 ozone therapy Tue, 16 Aug 2011 14:53:46 +0000 http://naturaldentistry.us/?p=245#comment-6252 Exactly how will i learn out a lot more details on this subject? Exactly how will i learn out a lot more details on this subject?

]]> By: Dr. Marvinhttp://naturaldentistry.us/245/the-dangers-of-the-great-fluoride-experiment/comment-page-1/#comment-5282 Dr. Marvin Fri, 24 Jul 2009 15:37:07 +0000 http://naturaldentistry.us/?p=245#comment-5282 You're correct in that they don't completely remove fluoride from your water, but they do remove trace amounts of fluoride, and even removing trace amounts is better than the alternative.It's difficult to find accurate information on exactly how much fluoride they remove because companies such as Pur and Britta like to advertise that they "leave beneficial fluoride in the water."This is why systems such as reverse osmosis would be preferable, although typically very expensive for personal use (and even reverse osmosis won't remove 100% of the fluoride from your water). You’re correct in that they don’t completely remove fluoride from your water, but they do remove trace amounts of fluoride, and even removing trace amounts is better than the alternative.

It’s difficult to find accurate information on exactly how much fluoride they remove because companies such as Pur and Britta like to advertise that they “leave beneficial fluoride in the water.”

This is why systems such as reverse osmosis would be preferable, although typically very expensive for personal use (and even reverse osmosis won’t remove 100% of the fluoride from your water).

]]> By: Andreahttp://naturaldentistry.us/245/the-dangers-of-the-great-fluoride-experiment/comment-page-1/#comment-5281 Andrea Fri, 24 Jul 2009 05:37:03 +0000 http://naturaldentistry.us/?p=245#comment-5281 PUR and Britta water filters and other charcoal water filters do not remove fluoride. PUR and Britta water filters and other charcoal water filters do not remove fluoride.

]]>